Figure 8
Citizens Against Police Abuse - Issues in Depth
A Civilian Review Board:Creating Trust And Accountability
Through Citizen Monitoring Of Police ActivitiesMany people in Louisville, particularly in the African-American, immigrant, and poor white communities, do not trust the police. This is partly due to the widespread dissatisfaction with the way complaints about police activities within the community are handled. These complaints range from harassment of youth hanging out on a street corner, to deadly use of force against unarmed men.
People are either afraid to file a complaint or think that it won't do any good. Some officers actually try to persuade people not to file formal complaints that will later become part of an officer's record. (See: OOPS?!: Process and Suggestions For Filing a Complaint and CAPA Harassment Form)
Basically, there is a lack of trust between the people of Louisville and the police. A lot of people do not believe that police officials take their complaints seriously. At best, investigations into these complaints by officials inside the police department are superficial, while at other times they are outright attempts to cover up misconduct and abuse.
Through news accounts and by word of mouth, Louisville has witnessed time and again the worst incidents of police or other law enforcement violence or abuse going unpunished. Sometimes those involved were even promoted or honored. Who looked into these cases and decided the fate of the officers involved? Who are the police accountable to? The answer in Louisville is that the police "police" themselves.
What is needed is a "civilian review board" that provides a way for ordinary people from the community to monitor and investigate complaints about police conduct. The idea behind civilian review of the police is basic to our democracy: the police are public servants whose role is to enforce the laws and protect public safety; but in doing so they must serve the people, not wage war against them. To accomplish this, there must be a level of trust between the police and this community that is rooted in accountability.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union or ACLU, already more than 60 percent of this nation's 50 largest cities have some type of civilian review system in place. While these vary widely, CAPA has found that there are some features that should be a part of any effective civilian review board. These features are designed to promote public confidence in the process:
This 2000 ordinance is the will of the people. CAPA went door to door asking people to sign postcards that were sent to the city reps and a county-wide Bluegrass Poll said that 73% want a civilian review board. It is legal and the people want it, so it needs to be fully funded and implemented.
Experiences from around the country, according to the ACLU, seem to suggest that the police fight tooth and nail to prevent review boards from coming into existence to begin with. Then, when it becomes politically inevitable that civilian review will be adopted, former police opponents suddenly become civilian review experts and propose the weakest possible models. And newly established civilian review boards still often must fight police opposition to its budget, authority, access to information, etc.
In Louisville, it took years of organizing work and a broad coalition to get a civilian review ordinance. The memories of James Taylor, Marshall Marbly, Antwan Bryant, Adrian Reynolds, Desmond Rudolph, Clifford Lewis, Rodney Abernathy, Robert Whitlow, Fidencio Campos-Cruz, James Taylor and all the other victims of law enforcement violence demand us to be persistent and defend what we have gained.
Through Citizen Monitoring Of Police ActivitiesMany people in Louisville, particularly in the African-American, immigrant, and poor white communities, do not trust the police. This is partly due to the widespread dissatisfaction with the way complaints about police activities within the community are handled. These complaints range from harassment of youth hanging out on a street corner, to deadly use of force against unarmed men.
People are either afraid to file a complaint or think that it won't do any good. Some officers actually try to persuade people not to file formal complaints that will later become part of an officer's record. (See: OOPS?!: Process and Suggestions For Filing a Complaint and CAPA Harassment Form)
Basically, there is a lack of trust between the people of Louisville and the police. A lot of people do not believe that police officials take their complaints seriously. At best, investigations into these complaints by officials inside the police department are superficial, while at other times they are outright attempts to cover up misconduct and abuse.
Through news accounts and by word of mouth, Louisville has witnessed time and again the worst incidents of police or other law enforcement violence or abuse going unpunished. Sometimes those involved were even promoted or honored. Who looked into these cases and decided the fate of the officers involved? Who are the police accountable to? The answer in Louisville is that the police "police" themselves.
What is needed is a "civilian review board" that provides a way for ordinary people from the community to monitor and investigate complaints about police conduct. The idea behind civilian review of the police is basic to our democracy: the police are public servants whose role is to enforce the laws and protect public safety; but in doing so they must serve the people, not wage war against them. To accomplish this, there must be a level of trust between the police and this community that is rooted in accountability.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union or ACLU, already more than 60 percent of this nation's 50 largest cities have some type of civilian review system in place. While these vary widely, CAPA has found that there are some features that should be a part of any effective civilian review board. These features are designed to promote public confidence in the process:
- Citizen Involvement: the review board must consist of citizens who represent the community at large, selected in an open and democratic process. If the Mayor or other city officials appoint the board members, citizens will wonder about their objectivity.
- Independence: a review board must have the authority to independently investigate incidents. While a review board must be a part of local government, it must be independent of and housed away from the Mayor's office, the Police Department, or Public Safety Department. (A review board does not diminish the power of the Mayor or Police Chief who would still determine the nature of any disciplinary actions against police officers who have engaged in misconduct. Board findings should be considered, however, in determining appropriate disciplinary action.)
- Investigatory power: the board should have complete access to police witnesses and documents. It must be able to conduct public hearings on serious incidents, subpoena witnesses and report the findings and recommendations to the public.
- Openness: all proceedings and records related to the board's activities must be open to the public.
- Adequate funding: a review board should not be a lower budget priority than the police internal affairs department and must receive enough funds to carry out its work or it cannot be effective.
This 2000 ordinance is the will of the people. CAPA went door to door asking people to sign postcards that were sent to the city reps and a county-wide Bluegrass Poll said that 73% want a civilian review board. It is legal and the people want it, so it needs to be fully funded and implemented.
Experiences from around the country, according to the ACLU, seem to suggest that the police fight tooth and nail to prevent review boards from coming into existence to begin with. Then, when it becomes politically inevitable that civilian review will be adopted, former police opponents suddenly become civilian review experts and propose the weakest possible models. And newly established civilian review boards still often must fight police opposition to its budget, authority, access to information, etc.
In Louisville, it took years of organizing work and a broad coalition to get a civilian review ordinance. The memories of James Taylor, Marshall Marbly, Antwan Bryant, Adrian Reynolds, Desmond Rudolph, Clifford Lewis, Rodney Abernathy, Robert Whitlow, Fidencio Campos-Cruz, James Taylor and all the other victims of law enforcement violence demand us to be persistent and defend what we have gained.
Much of the information on the CAPA web site (and more!) and can be found in the CAPA information packet, "Criminal Justice or Institutional Racism and Classism in the United States and Kentucky? How Does this Relate to Police Abuse?" For PDF version of this packet, click the following link:
full packet-april 10, 2003.pdf
To obtain this and some of the other files linked on this site, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader. To obtain a free copy, click the following link: Free Adobe Reader
full packet-april 10, 2003.pdf
To obtain this and some of the other files linked on this site, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader. To obtain a free copy, click the following link: Free Adobe Reader
